Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

The First True Epic in A Modern WorldLanguage

Virendrakumar Jain'sAnuttar Yogi : TirthankarMahavir

Publishers: Sri Vir Nirvan Granth Prakashan Samiti,
48 Sitalmata Bazar, Indore-2,
(Madhya Pradesh), India

 

'THE GREATEST WORK OF LITERATURE SINCE

TOLSTOY'S 'WAR AND PEACE' AND THE FIRST

TRUE EPIC IN A MODERN WORLD LANGUAGE."

 

We are before a master work, a classic, a literary event of thefirst

magnitude. When that happens a new civilising force gropes thehearts of men

and a new testament and reaffirmation of the Will of Man unwittingunder the

travail of pitiless destiny has come to be indicted.

 

And as a witness to such rare passion play of human hope andfaith, of

human sorrow and redemption, we can render only praise andadoration; we can

only celebrate its being.

 

A work of art, as Jacob Brownowski had said, is known to benecessary only

when it has been made, because it then becomes the unraveller ofthe mystery

of our humanity and testifies to our capacity for culture. And amaster work

like this one vivifies and expemplifies the yearnings of our soulsand the

possibilities of our attainments. This work does that with ampleand

dazzling splendour. Therefore, I call this work a true epic, as anepic

unfolds the farthest reaches of our vision and mythicise acivilisation;

this work does that. We live by myths.

 

This work will be a heritage of our times to posterity.

 

ANUTTAR YOGI is overtly a novelised prose life story of Mahavir.To say

that is saying nothing. It is like saying that 'The Ramayan' isthe

biography of Ram, one of the many gods of the Hindus or that 'LaComedia

Divina' is a Christian story of the Roman Catholic sect. Even acommunist

intellectual would not dismiss them like that. Views ofphilistines in such

matters are irrelevant.

 

Of the multiple graces - To begin with, let me note a few of the'Anuttar

Yogi's writer's graces of rendition.

 

Here in his work he has exhibited the visionary intensity of aMelville of

'Moby Dick';

the magniloquence and descriptive grandeur of a Milton of the'Paradise

Lost;

the understanding of the language of a Joyce of 'Ulysses' andthe

'Finnegan's Wake,;

the apt erudition and tonal mastery of a Pound of 'The Cantos'and the

Troubador's songs;

the emotion mirroring and meaning intensifying cadences of anEliot in his

major poems;

the faultless mellifluousness of a Tennyson of 'In Memoriam'; thechiselled

phrasing of a Pope of the 'Rape of the Lock' and the 'Essay onMan';

even the playful suppleness of words and the ease of an Auden inhis better

poems;

the all-inclusive ambience of identity of a Whitman of the 'Songsof Myself'

and of the 'Leaves of Grass';

the unearthly lyricism of a Keats of the "St. Agnes' Eve' if onecan imagine

that to keep on flowing for 500 pages;

 

And then add to these -

the world ingesting scope and power of a Tolstoy of the 'War andPeace' and

his penetration in 'The Death of Ivan Illyich' and 'Father Joseph'.

 

I have called it an epic because here is at long last the seeingdone by the

'equal eye" of a Shakespeare.

After such excellence, what criticism!

 

Mahavir, the Son of Man - And so unsurprisingly Mahavir, thehero, emerges

as the Son of Man, who is One with His Father and who is King ofkings and

all men; therefore, a pathfinder of spirit, the food of legends,the

superhuman node of myths, the reflector of our doubts, theexemplar of our

triumphs, the picture of our sorrows, the arbiter of ourrelationships and

the Hearer of the Word and to us the Sayer of the same, and thenabove all

the Silent Witness radiating inexhaustible compassion.

 

Virendrakumar's Anuttar Yogi Tirthankar Mahavir is all these andwe are

made to understand how a man becomes God; and how want to worshipthem; and

why Ram and Krishn are our ineradicable and fulgent emblems of ourreal

humanity and which in their is also our divinity.

 

I have said that Mahavir is all men (women too) because he isthe central

reference of the being of all the characters peopling this books,like Ram

in the Ramayan and Krishn in the Mahabharat.

 

But you may ask, is this all relevant to you for this today andthe

tomorrow immediately following? I will say yes; much more relevantthan the

morning paper you read for news and information; much morerelevant than the

latest best-seller and egghead-talked-about novel you may bereading; much

more relevant than most of the things you are advised to read tokeep

yourself well-informed and knowledgeable.

 

This book is relevant to you because it relates you directly tothe better

man that is within you, and without relating to whom you willremain the

zero which you normally are.

 

This is why we read fiction because there the characters live forus as

models who vividly accredit our life's experiences withclarifying

actuality. That is so because fiction is a created object and weas created

beings are always, in some measure, appreciative of the value ofthe

creative process. In fiction we live our lives in greater fullnessand

variousness.

 

Anuttar Yogi does this spledidly because it is a sublime work offiction -

'sublime' in the sense of Longinus, the ancient Greekaestheticism.

 

In Anuttar Yogi Mahavir is made 'the Man' for us whom we thenrediscover by

other names and with correlative attributes in other epics.

 

The magnificent amplitude - The piercing impact of Anuttar Yogi'swahrheit

und dichtung is accomplished by Virendrakumar's esemplasticityof

imagination that can utilise all the literary machinery of theclassical

epics by the ancients (except for versification whose absence inthis work

he make us forget by erasing the normal distinctions between proseand

verse) by developing an utterly and organically coherentwetanschauung that

is not only credible but continually appealing as he is alwaysable to

project on our awareness his characters and their actions,situations,

relationships, descriptions, narrations, dialogues, monologues,asides,

views, opinions, & c., unfailingly at two levels in sentenceafter sentence,

page after page, right through the two volumes.

 

At one level everything is happening in a setting of time andplace removed

from us by a distance of more than two millennia, but then, (andthat is the

effect of Virendrakumar's literary creative powers) everythingsaid, done,

felt and seen by these characters is also found to be our own feltreality,

and in their dilemmas and resolutions we see a reflection of ourown

predicaments and their likely solutions.

 

Epics do that age after age. Anuttar Yogi does that now zeitgeistis

mirrored there in Anuttar Yogi in the totality of this confusionbut within

a frame of its own clarification charted in the evolution ofMahavir's

enlightenment and its subsequent activation in the world ofmen.

 

Mahavir is a Blessed One, and He blesses us after we have knownof him from

Anuttar Yogi.

 

But what of the amplitude? I will show a glimpse of it now as itis

displayed in Anuttar Yogi by Virendrakumar by merely listing aportion of it

as a catalogue.

 

Proliferant panoply of a wondrous world - Who people this fictiveworld of

our anterior reality?

Murderers, pimps, whores, soldiers, generals, politicians,businessmen,

traders, cobblers, carpenters, potmakers, farmers, tnners,butches, grocers,

maidervants, valets, charioteers monks, mendicants, revellers,whoremongers;

 

Kings : witless, restless, demonaic, righteous;

 

Queens : imperious, devious, lecherous, docile;

 

Angels, archangels, seraphim, cherubim, gods, goddesses, godletssupergods;

 

Children : playful; boys : mischievous.

 

Maidens : languorous, nubile, docile, recumbent, rampant,inviting,

pacifying. elevating;

 

Men at works, play, labour and in sickness, cripples, idiots andthe

mutilated;

 

Men : arrogant, mean, lustful, sorrowful, sincere; degenerate,reprobate,

trustful, fearful, superstitious, self-sacrificing, calculating,cunning,

wise, nice, sinful, redeemed, strange;

 

Poet, artists, chemists, danceuse, quacks, scholars, poseurs,fools,

simpletons, dumb, deaf, deformed, supple; they are all here.

 

Animals and beasts : fabulous, ferocious, benign, vengeful - fromthis,

nether and other worlds' even worms and reptiles of such worlds;and then

the bird of air;they are all here.

 

Winds and breezes, storms, maelstroms, hours and airs in desert,seas and

towns; dissolving heavens and crumling cities; temples, palaces,hovels, and

comfortable homes;

 

Stones : precious, roadside and in mountains and in walls;

 

Perfumes to elevate, invite, captivate and to copulate;

 

Touch to thrill, affright, hypnotise and sublimate;

 

Machines of war, commerce, art, enterainment - terrestrial andcelestial;

 

Phenomena, epiphenomena of nature, super-nature, nether-nature(Virendra

shows himself as an unequalled master of such descriptions);

 

Colours of drugged fancy, ecstatic imagination, celestialpanorama and

hells' spite and despite;

 

Foods to salivate tongues, jaded or abraded;

 

Evil dressed as chastity; charity guising deceit;

 

Religious ceremonies, theological disputations, philosophicallucubrations

and dissertations, councils, of war, world-griddling plans forcommerce, and

deep matters of state; these are all here.

 

Sweet nothings for unlistening ears lost in bodies' commingledundulations;

 

Advices of father to son, cook to thief, friend to friend, motherto

daughter and to mother-in-law; politician to his henchmen, traderto trader,

woman to her paramour, courtezan to multitude;

 

And flowers and flowers;

 

Dresses of gods, men, monks, flagbearers, charioteers, all theseare here.

 

Orgies - sacred and profane;

 

Tours of multiple hells and polyvalent heavens;

 

Tours of the minds of harlots, gods, men in ecstasy and indefeat, woman in

child-birth and in her lover's embrace.

 

Textures - of curling leaf in dry wind, crumbling walls offorlorn temples,

of a tumbling infant, of a woman inrut, of a man in bliss. All arehere.

 

And terrors and horrors - of men under torture, of a man frontinga

fearsome beast, of a man in wilderness, of a man lonely - aloneand in a

crowd, of a man dying, of a man in the fear of the unknown, of aman

besieged of multitudinous devils, of a mother about to lose a son,of a

father betrayed by a son, of a iover deceived, of rotting flesh,of unknown

disease.

 

And the ecstasy of a man receiving enlightenment, of a manbecoming the god

of gods, of kings making conquests, of an artist rendering hisvision

entire, of a woman subduing her chosen man, of a womansurrendering herself

as a mother, of a woman making her man, of lust satisfied, ofmerit

rewarded, of worth appreciated of profits doubled, of lossavoided, of

knowing what others could not know. All are here.

 

Real and actual - They are all here, more actual than the nailyou have

just pared and are about to throw away; more actual than theembrace of the

slut for which you paid with your picked pocket; more real thanthe smiles

of your first baby; more real than the first cusswords you learnt;more real

than the first borrowed song you crooned to your sweetheart; moreactual

than the first rears that scalded your first sorrow and hurt; morereal than

the solace of your dreams for a better word; more real than yourboss's

meanness; and as a real as the certainly of your death and theinjustice of

it to you.

 

I am talking like this because it is not merely reading a bookbut a

piercing experience and the descent of a refulgent vision thatlightens the

dark of human destiny, and the mystery which any two persons areto each

other. These are less of dark and less of mystery; and you canwith

pardonable complacence pretend that you too can know what Manis.

 

But withal this I have still left out the thing which makesfiction a human

necessity, that is Eroticism (or 'Kam') - Eros is our life'sfruit-bearing

tree. Every world epic and every enduring human myth of creationshows its

field of action originating from the molestation of the heroinewho is the

beloved or the spouse of the hero and the rest of the epic is thenthe

narration of the consequences of that act and setting right theinjustice

implied in that act. This basic mystic communally is also alliedto our

identification of women with Nature and our knowledge that wecannot go

against nature's laws without inviting reprisals. Therefore,violation of

woman is taken as violation of Nature which is bound to result indrastic

and injurious consequences to their instigator. At the same time,the union

of male and female in due course, is perceived to be a necessityand

requirement of Nature, but to be performed only in a lawfulmanner. Going

along with nature is joy; against her, of course, is theconcrete

objkectification of this joyis preservation and its manifoldramifications

in their characters' personal lives. In such characterisations themyths are

always true to the perception presented to the deepest recesses ofour

consciousness. Therefore, they endure.

 

But it is these same epic characterisations which are also inconflict at

many points with the rationale of scriptural injunctions of theirown

religion. Which to choose or our guidance?

 

This brings us to the kill - joyful puritanism on the one sideand

hypocritical prudery on the other. Both are philistine attitudesignorant of

the seminal urges of the creative process; and are primarilyconcerned with

conservation and stability, therefore, conservative. While thecreator, in

contrast, due to the compulsions of creativity is enaoured ofthe

transformations of Nature and the dynamism of the process of theindividual

and collective human growth; and therefore, he is basically aradical and a

revolutionary.

 

The world literature of the previous century and this mirrorsthis

dichotomy with forceful, and some may say, with chaoticvividness,

particularly in the treatment and the depiction of the eroticsituation. The

western writer faced with the problem of the objective creativerendition of

the erotic situation in his works either throws away the entireChristian

religious and mystic conduct framework to depend on his directobservations

as moulded by his individual sensibility, or seeks inspiration inpre-or

trans-Christian mythos, particularly Greek and Nordic. In caseswhen he

limits himself to assimilating those Christian myths which hethinks

suitable for his purpose he finds his reditions devoid ofexperiential

immediacy and contemporary relevance. This is noticable in T. S.Eliot's

Ariel Poem' and 'Four Quartets' - and in 'Murder in the Cathedral'he avoids

these situations altogether thus reducing their dramaticforce.

 

The writer under the wrench of having to deny his own culturebecause its

rationale goes against the truth of this own valid creation isforced to

exhibit his range and indignation while trying to free himself ofsuch

bondage to a sterile, and to him a valueless tradition. VictorHugo, Balzac,

Stendahl, Goethe, Maypassant, Zola, Fielding, Dickens, Thackerey,Blake,

Shelly, Keats, Browining, even Tennyson, Gogol, Pushkin, Turgenev,Chekhov,

Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy too, Poe, Whitman, Hawthorne, Melville andmany

other European masters in the last century show this rage at thedifficulty

of this assimilation, and most of them became Athenians, Ioniansand

Spartans in mind.

 

In the twentieth century the rage has turned into full negation.The writer

now can trust only his two bare eyes and what they see before themand what

his over-exposed nerves can feel from his mid-body. And what hesees is two

bodies wresting against a backdrop of choas and absurdityproducing nothing;

and what he feels is tiredness, disgust and despair. Everythingis

frightful, terrible and pointless. Henry Miller and Samuel Beckettare the

two visible ends of this spectrum. The first photographing himselfin

everything, the second drawing an ever-expanding zero which,however, has to

be drawn. Vladimir Nobokov in the middle turned his scintillantlights on

shattered mirrors to reflect distortions and fragments. Lawrence(D.H.)

tried to exercise the ghost by surface explicitness only toobfuscate the

vision. Rilke made himself a member of an unearthly society whereOrpheus

sang tunefully of sweetest sorrows. Nikos Kazantzakis wanted toknow Christ

and got a human Christ, fulblooded and passionate, but not the onewho said,

"I am the Resurrection and Life". Sartre probed the dirt, found itabsurd

but undeniably existent. Camus felt the burning heat estrangingand

pointless, and himself, there was himself, outside and futile.Kafka,

Ionescu, Gunter Grass tried permutations and combinations ofthings and

creatures changing into each other. Joyce wen farthest and wrechedthe

language itself in "Finnegan's Wake' to see whether Chaos' designscould be

found from incoherence. Ungaretti, Rene Char, etc., invitedhermetic

word-games so that lexical meaning and implied feeling could bedetached

from each other to keep only the latter, but all that turned intoa black

hole of anti-sense. Concrete poetry with no cementing concreteemerged but

the makers made nothing themselves ad only rearranged what wasreadymade and

ended up by boring themselves as well. A Kurt Vonnegut takes hiswriter to

live in the far future in which technology has made sexunnecessary and men

are made men or women by machines. A few have even ordered theirimagination

to see whether tables, chair and inkpots can be made intospeaking

characters. And those who like later Maulraux and Solokhov imposedorder and

optimism from outside by the power of their craft and skill andfound their

work losing clarification relevance. Even a Yeats had to rage andwander in

exotic locales. An Alexander Solzhenytsin limns circling hellswhich are now

for him the Earth's irremovable mantle.

 

Some like Hemingway, Zweig, Toller, Mishima, Kawabata went madand killed

themselves.

 

All those whose name have been here named, and many others hereunnamed,

followed with unbending integrity the truth of their vision towhere it led

them to confirm that myths are truer embodiment of Man's Estatethan any

philosophically constructed model of human conduct.

 

Against this plangent display of vitality of the literature ofthe West

(the two Japanese names are representative to us of westernsensibility) our

modern and contemporary literature appears either as a pallid anddim

imitative superstructure or an intellectually built-up screeplay -though in

some cases done with exquisite skill - fabricated by unconfidentvision

which does not touch the roots of our existence and sources of ourculture

and, therefore, remains radically irrelevant. An unconfidentvision can

never face and render the erotic situation truthfully andhonestly, i.e.,

creatively. We have plenty of pornographic mishmash littering ourstreets,

but hardly a novel that tells us truly with integral explicitnesswhat a man

and a woman do to each other in their nakedness and what theymeans and are

to each other then.

 

A writer who evades this situation is a traitor to hiscreativity. This is

baffling and strange when considered in relation to our culturalmythos

which alone in human civilisation has given visionary archetypalexpression

to all the conceivable erotic human relationships against abackground of

various cosmological possibilities.

 

Here I will only say that there must be some central flaw in ourcountry's

contemporary culture to have so enfeebled the creative artist'svision at

its source. Sex is not only the power of procreation but ofcreation too.

Sex is not only posture ending in copulation. One sometimes feelsthat the

guardians of our culture (including some writers too) think thatand

otherwise all-wise God made a terrible blunder in providing manwith a penis

and woman with a vagina and impelling them to mate to perpetuatethe

species. So our literature suffers and is sick. When literature issick, the

nation becomes diseased. Prudery and hypocrisy are interchangeableand for

both of these power is pleasure, which is, of course, a thoroughperversion

of man's humanity. The sad result of this perversion in ournational life is

there in plain sight for anyone with eyes to see.

 

The marvel of Anuttar Yogi - This detour was made to bring up tothe marvel

that is Anuttar Yogi. Eros is here; more intimate than everpossible to a

slavering pornographer, but never, even for a moment, lascivious.An Eros in

which consciousness is alert all over and aware everywhere. A factof life

giving life. Mahavir is Eros that is Logos and Logos that isEros.

Therefore, he is a man who is divine and the divinity that isMan.

 

All the faces of Eros are delineated by Virendra with such suredelicacy

and firmness that the reader is translated to a state of

preter-consciousness - I mean, the reader who knows how toread.

 

Nowhere is the 'equal eye' of Virendra more in evidence than whenhe

engaged himself in depicting the states of consciousness revealedby the

Eros' workings. All the major characters of Anuttar Yogi, Mahaviranot

excluded, have to contend with and confront Eros either to subdueand

transcend him or to be subdued and be obliterated by him. And withwhat apt

skill - only possible to one with the 'equal eye' - all of it hasbeen done,

with never a discord, with never a superfluity.

 

Erect penis in a temple - This skill reaches to supreme heightswhere the

transmutes an incident of the Jain Puranic lore into an episode inwhich a

self - attached disciple (Makkhali Goshalak) of Mahavir, whenwatching make

and female devotees dancing a midnight dance of devotion in andaround a

temple, strays into the inner sanctum where he lets his thoughtsdwell on

the regardless languor of a few winsome entranced female devotees.He cannot

contain and restrain himself. His sign of maleness exhibits itselfin rigid

protrusion. Then as a final blasphemy he makes it rest on thegranite

representation of the deity. And then... (read the book.)

 

Tell me, which writer, modern or unmodern could have thought ofsuch

incident, even if available to him, in the first place as aconstituent of

artistic reification. And if having thought of it so, would hehave dared to

use it! And if had he dared to use it, would he have had the powerof

rendition to turn it into an episode of exquisite beauty without atrace of

lechery and a thing of great spiritual significance; and all thatby a power

(I don't know how the hell Virendra is capable of such miracles)of

magically accurate and exact description without any extraneouscommentary.

Virendra is right on target like this all the time throughoutAnuttar Yogi.

While reading these volumes this kind of skill looked to me somemanner of

unnatural sleight-of-hand or some sort of devilish black magic.But before

long, I could know what was it. And I said to myself, "Ha ! It isthe equal

eye' of Shakespeare again. It had been long in coming. Blessed beme! I

lived to see it working."

 

After such miraculous display of literary art of dazzlingexactitude, and

which is beyond the dreams of ambition of anyone now living andwriting, he

compels us to place him alongside the supreme masters - amongthe

occidentals Dante and Shakespeare. After Shakespeare neitherGoethe nor

Tolstoy is his equal in lighting up the polyfoliate features ofEros that is

Logos with such pellucid accuracy. I won't go to legendsanctifiedHomer - he

is different.

 

Among the orientals, I know only of the Indian masters. Thelatest one that

can reach is the sparkling wizard Jayadev of 'Geet Govind', andbefore him

the magnificent, Bhas, Banabhatt and Kalidas.

 

Am I saying too much? Am I going gaga and bananas? Read AnuttarYogi and

wonder... I dare you to disagree with me and enter intodisputation!

 

And from where Virendra gets this 'equal eye'? By some GreatGod's alchemy

he has the truth of his vision firmly and infrangible centred andanchored

into that source of his creativity where a man's should is thesilent,

detached and ever-delighted witness of Nature's ever changes,which it sees

as being enacted for its own delight. - And then there is a Manand a Woman

fated to come together and join; Why? In Anuttar Yogi this Why isless of a

Why.

 

Without such centering and anchoring of his vision it would neverhave been

possible for him to enter into the mind of a fully enlightened manlike

Mahavir and bare for us his mental processes leading toenlightenment. Only

such centering makes such metempsychosis possible for the creativevision.

Even a Tulsidas and a Surdas could only look at their Ram andKrishn from

outside in adoration and wonderment. Sri Aurobindo also could notachieve

this internality in his 'Savitri'. And without such visionaryingestion,

Mahavir would not live in Anuttar Yogi for as one of us and us,and as God

too.

 

If this is not sublime then where was anything sublime in anyliterature

anywhere at any time?

 

Rhetoric of such sublimity true rhetoric is always an inseparabletorch

bearing herald. Man's situation in Nature is perpetual rhetoric.He has

always to ask, "Why be?" and he says in defiance, "I am...." (thedots are

our poetry, literature region, science and mathematics).therefore, I

endure".

 

Obviously in those situations where this central question has tobe

addressed to, employment of full eloquence is a necessity. AnuttarYogi

continually addresses itself to this question and Virendra'scharacters are

always suitably eloguent. All of Mahavir's perorations arematchless in this

respect, equalled in English only by Shakespeare in his greattragedies. We

hear them directly addressed to us rousing the fervour of ouremotions.

And when Virendra's Mahavir speaks to us thus, A Hindu will belistening to

Krishna in Mahabharata, a Christian to Christ in the Sermon on theMount, a

Moslem to Mohamed in A1 Quran speaking to his legion in Medina,and a Sikh

will see Guru Gobind Singh turning his Panj Piaras into embodimentof the

Sacrificial Spirit.

I could personally understand a little of how RamakrishnParamahans

inbreathed into Vivekanand the cosmos-trifling valour of the soul,and how

Gandhi became a man of utter fearlessness and a knower of theright action

through his mantra of Ahinsa.

 

And so Mahavir in Anuttar Yogi is seen and shown to be what he is- one of

the few shapers in our civilisation's annals of Man's immortalbliss -

beholding and bliss-seeking Spirit.

 

And when face to face with such ampleur shall I now become aniggling

pedant and talk of technique and structure, tenor and texture,semiotics,

deictics, craft and vehicle, tone and metaphor, balance and style,weight

and pacing, phrasing and casing, plots and unities, singularitiesand

diction, of existential imperatives, of iterative gestalts, of

psycho-coherent contouring, of phonemic simulacrums, ofobjective

correlative, of phanodesic reification, of no need to express butan

obligation to express, and on and on? I won't do that. Enough ofthat is

done by us as academics!

 

I should also refer here to the appendices that Virendra hasadded to each

volume of Anuttar Yogi expositing some of the questions andcasting in

passing some incisive asides and obiter dicta with his usual highcapacity

for emotive argumentation. They will be an academician's delight,but for

the reader of Anuttar Yogi and impediment to the absorption of thebook by

him. Anuttar Yogi an impediment to the absorption of the book byhim.

Anuttar Yogi does not need these appendices; neither does Virendraafter

Anuttar Yogi. They should be removed from subsequent editions. Acreated

object needs no justications. It is your ill-luck or foolishnessif you pass

a lying diamond by.

 

One may also ask why no thought has been given to AnuttarYogi's

translation into other Indian and major world languages. Somelarge -

hearted philanthropists should associate themselves with suchprojects to

give wide dissemination to this great literary heritage.

 

At the end, let me again say that in Anuttar Yogi Virendra hasgiven

Mahavir back to us as the Knower of Right and as the Light on thePath of

Righteousness. It is for us to profit by His example because Hespeaks to us

as a friend who has shared our intimate secrets. I am a Hindu, anda proud

Hindu, but the Mahavir given to us by Virendra in Anuttar Yogi hasexacted

my lasting adoration.

 

And what to say of Virendra, the witness, the maker! AfterAnuttar Yogi he

is beyond the crutch of praise. He lives now in the Vedicutterance (Ekoham

bahusyam- One I am, let Me be many). He has become an 'artificershaping

wordless time.' It is not given to an artist (and to anyone else)to be more

than that. He just is. He is now his own laws, his own joy.Adieu.

 

by C. S.Vishwanathan
9th February, 1981

11/288, 'Prabhat',
Sion Road. East,
Mumbai - 400 022.

 

Virendra KumarJain
Biographical Information

 

1915 : October 17, born at Mandasaur (M.P.)

1996 : December 17, died in Mumbai

1937 : Graduated (B.A.) with English Literature, Philosophy, andHindi

Literature from Holkar College, Indore.

1941 : Did post-graduation (M.A.) studies with Hindi Literaturefrom Nagpur

University.

 

Awards and Honours Received

1. 1990 - Priyadarshini Academy's Literary Award for literaryexcellence.

2. 1990 - Maharashtra State Hindi Sahitya Akademi's ChhatrapatiShivaji

Rashtriya Ekta Puraskar for literary excellence.

3. 1986 - Madhya Pradesh Government's Department of Culture'sShikhar Samman

and citation (For the year 1985 - 86) For - SignificantContribution to

Hindi literature.

4. 1986 - Bharatiya Gyanpith's Moortidevi Literary Award, citationand a

replica of Vagdevi (For the year 1984) - For Muktidoot.

5. 1985 - Janadharma - Hindi weekly of Bhopal's JanadharmaSaraswat Samman

and shield - For : Overall Contribution to Hindi litarature.

6. 1981 - Bharatiya Bhasha Parishad, Calcutta's award and shield -For

Anuttar Yogi

7. 1976 - Madhya Pradesh Rajya Samman and shield - For OverallContribution

to Hindi literature.

8. 1975 - Madhya Pradesh Sahitya Parishad, Bhopal's All IndiaTulsi Puraskar

For : Shunya Purush Aur Vastuen.

9. 1974 - Uttar Pradesh Government's Hindi Academy's award For :Ek Aur

Nilanjana.

10. 1971 - Vishva Dharma Parishad, Kota's award For :Muktidoot

 

Important Phases of his career

1. Worked with Madam Sophia Wadia. For one year, namely, 1948,translated

form English into Hindi, Several philosophical and spiritualarticles of

great world-known thinkers.

2. Was Assistant Editor of "Dharmayug", the illustrated HindiWeekly, for

the decade of 1950 - 1960.

3. Was Chief Editor of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan's Hindi monthlymagazine

"Bharati" for five years - 1961 to 1965. Then he was very close tothe great

personality K.M. Munshi. Shri Munshi loved and admired him duringthis

association of theirs.

4. As a lecturer taught Hindi at Mithibai College, Mumbai for thewhole

decade of 1966-1976.

5. Became Chief Editor of "Navaneet (Hindi Digest)", a magazine ofall India

repute, in 1980; and edited it till June 1985.

 

Retired from active Employment on June 30, 1985.

 

For resume of Significant Experiences of Life refer to thefollowing sheet...

 

Significant Experiences of Life (Written by the author)

1. Worked, sometimes, at the risk of life, as an undergroundleaflet-writer

during the Quit India Movement of 1942.

2. Passed through infernal soul agonies of death - fixation andother

existential enigmas and metaphysical questions, sometimes foryears, almost

verging on death. In this quest-journey of soul I probed into theworks of

great world philosophers including Karl Marx, the existentialists,and, on

the other hand, I went through the important scriptures of all thereligions

and theologies of the world; and sought answer to my existentialquestions

in the life and works of Ramkrishna Paramhansa, Shri Aurobindo,Vivekanand,

Gandhi, Raman Maharshi, J. Kirshna Murti, Emanuel Swedenborg,Jacob Bohen,

Paracelsue etc. I went through the teachings of Buddha, Mahavir,Krishna,

Christ, Shankar; the Vedic and Upanishadic lore; the classic epicsof the

world, like, Mahabharat, Gita, as well as the works of the Westernmasters

like Dante, Milton, Goethe and the Sufis.

But, none of these great master - thinkers and spiritual apostlescould

finally satisfy me, nor could they answer my poignant questionsand

inquisitions about the Ultimate Reality. At long last, aftermortal

suffering and struggle in this journey of soul I could discover myown

independent spiritual path and a unique metaphysics.

This discovery of mine is reflected in all of my creativeworks,

particularly and distinctly in my epic novel 'Anuttar Yogi', inwhich my

Mahavir answers burning questions of all times, right upto our owntimes,

here and now, in a multi dimensional, dynamic language of his own- a

gospelic combination of Eros and Ethos is achieved in thisdiscovery, which

can satisfy the modern man and the new man in the offing - the NewBeing.

All this exploration of the inner space and the outer space, ismade

possible by my acute passion and lust for life, at the point of myintense

creative force, process and work.

On the economic front, I have lived and struggled all through mydays; due

to my hypersensitive, romantic, poetic nature, and an all -absorbing

spiritual quest, I couldn't concentrate on the economic aspect ofmy life.

As a result of it, at this end of my life, I am facing an awefulfinancial

void - with no secure support in sight.

To order books, write to manish.modi@bol.net.in

HOME